John Sheehan, S.J. (Jesuit priest)

Of course, before Israel, (pre 1948) the Middle East was mostly divided up between British and French colonialist mandates and puppet governments, so of course the United States wouldn’t worry about hostile governments.
(via yafilasteen)
storyseldomtold submitted:
The commentary:
Alright Harvard Business School, let’s have a word or two.
I understand that you like to “change” things in your dining room every once in a while to tickle the palate of the HBS kids who have a tendency to grow blasé rather quickly of your stationary Italian, Asian, & Micronesian stations, so you feel the need to spice it up with an occasional exotic nationality… but this, THIS, is where we draw the line. Israeli food station? Hold your breath.
Let’s see:
1. Harissa (هريسة) is a Tunisian and Libyan hot chili sauce whose main ingredient is piri piri. Piri piri grows in the wild in Africa. —> Since Israel is not in Africa, Harissa is not Israeli.
2. Couscous (كسكس) is a Maghrebian dish, a staple food throughout Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Libya. Not Israeli. As for “Israeli couscous”, the real name is “Maftoul” (مفتول), which is a Palestinian dish of Couscous.
3. Fattūsh (فتوش) is a word made of Arabic fatt “crush” and the suffix of Turkic origin -ūsh. Coining words this way was common in Syrian Arabic as well as in other dialects of Arabic. —> Unless Israel’s main language is Arabic, this too is NOT Israeli.
4. Halloumi (χαλούμι) is a Cypriot semi-hard, unripened brined cheese made from a mixture of goats’ and sheep milk. It’s not even ARABIC. So seriously, your “fuck-you” is not even centered around Arabs, it’s going west. —> Until Cyprus becomes another conquered Israeli territory, Halloumi is considered NOT Israeli.
5. Hummus (حُمُّص): Let’s get to the bottom of this once and for all. Hummus is an Arabic word meaning “chickpeas.” Ok? It is an Arabic word. As far as “Israelis” are concerned, they don’t speak Arabic. So unless you change your primary language, you have no argument here. The earliest documented recipe for something similar to modern hummus dates to 13th Century (CE) Egypt. —> Since Israel was created in 1948, Israel is NOT 13th CENTURY EGYPT! And Hummus is therefore NOT ISRAELI.
6. Tahini (طحينه): ONE: Tahini is a loanword from Arabic: طحينة, or more accurately ṭaḥīnīa طحينية, and is derived from the root ط ح ن Ṭ-Ḥ-N which as a verb طحن ṭaḥan which means “to grind.” TWO: You can only make Hummus with Tahini, since it is the second main ingredient. —> As per the argument of Hummus, we conclude that Tahini is NOT Israeli.
7. Zaatar (زَعْتَر): Alright. Zaatar is THYME. It is a Middle-Eastern plant. It grows in Palestine and other land areas. Since Israel is modern-day Palestine, then I can see why you would like to make that plant Israeli. And you might be able to get away with it. But get this: Zaatar is an Arabic word. So, to make your argument more solid, why don’t you use a Hebrew word for it? Like “שקר”, which is hebrew for LIE.
8. Mezze (in the title): This word (which refers to a selection of small dishes) comes from the Turkish meze ‘taste, flavour, snack, relish’, borrowed from Persian مزه (maze ‘taste, snack’ < mazīdan ‘to taste’) and/or the Greek version mezés (μεζές). SO TURKISH, PERSIAN and GREEK —> NOT ISRAELI.
9. “Sweet & Sour”: This draws the f*ckin limit. Now this sure isn’t Arabic, but I would like to see Chinatown respond to this.
Dear HBS, that “Israeli Mezze Station” is the ultimate multicultural, multireligious fuck-you in the face of ALL Arabs at once from North Africa to the Levant… (while engaging a small spit on the Cypriots)… NINE counts.
If you insist on giving no honor to the Arabs (many of whom are Harvard students/alumni- “hi!”), and/or if you insist on never ever speaking of Arabs in culinary worth (since we’re only ever referred to as warmongers and terrorists), at least have the decency of calling it MEDITERRANEAN MEZZE STATION.
Israel already has a hard time keeping face in the Arab world for the way it has “appropriated” its lands since 1948, don’t make it worse for them by having them appropriate other peoples’ foods as well.
“Before placing your order, please inform your server if a person in your party is an Islamic fundamentalist and/or has ties to the Chinese government. We will rectify the nationality of your dish accordingly.
Sincerely, HBS”
Onwards.
(Picture taken by my dear friend/Harvard classmate “Mohamed El Dahshan” two days ago in the Harvard Business School Dining Room)- Sara El-Yafi
I’m not speaking for other Arab countries, but Israelis/Jews come from many countries - including North-Africa (which some of those dishes like couscous or harissa are from). So the Maghrebi Jews who emigrated there obviously took some of the North-African cultures with them which is perfectly normal as it’s as much their culture as any other North-African.
So, I personally have no problem with those North-African dishes being called “Israeli” in that case. It’s not appropriation as the native people from those regions brought it into Israel.
The majority of Israelis are either of Mizrahi (Jews who had lived in North Africa and the Middle East for the past several centuries) or of mixed Mizrahi descent. Israeli cuisine tends to reflect that.
(via bintrushd)
Kaveh Golestan, an Iranian photojournalist who gained international acclaim for documenting the aftermath of the Saddam Hussein’s poison gas attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja, which resulted in approximately 5,000 civilian deaths and 10,000 casualties.
Kaveh Golestan: Recording the Kurdish Struggle
(via ajammc)
akio:
I don’t buy Jeffrey Goldberg (mostly ‘Not at all’) - and I really don’t think much of Walter Russell Mead. Thus the cheap introduction part is not quoted in.
My experience has been that antisemitism (personal or political etc) can exist at anywhere anytime. it’s a strong, potent and ubiquitous ‘meme’ - we haven’t - we never have come to deal with necessary amount of seriousness.
It’s not particular thing to Egypt, or poor, or ‘backward’ human groups, or Middle East or anything. It’s like very common mold spore - just need a bit of humidity and it says ‘Hi’.
And problem is we don’t have effective counter-meme, vaccination (preventive etc) - developed. We’ve been barely serious about it - likewise with most of the racism we humans carry.
Problem really - to me - is that we decided to cover this problem with shallow denial, shallow behavioral solutions. Facade. Facile. Just say, just say it (the spore) is not on me, or not on you, not on anyone -
Well. That’s not true at all.
We need the new real way to talk about it, new courage and really strong psychology to talk through about this ‘collective’ virus or meme - and work on to build the measures to deal with, repair this problem.
But then, as same with the case of most of the racism - the actual society really cannot - yet to - accept those real measures to counter these viruses (racisms). Our societies are mostly far from such points.
And that limit - even clouds the eyes we have, the way we talk about, the way we can think about the problem. (But then, the most crushing part of this problem is the goodness, the courage, the creativity we all internally, potentially have is so enormous, but they never can be unleashed on the problem of races, racism - anti-semitism included.)
And it’s been that way, probably way too long.
Egyptian television is filled with such sociology. One popular series depicts an Egyptian diplomat stationed in Tel Aviv who robs Israeli banks on the side. The show was promoted by a Middle East satellite channel, which claimed that it would “surprise the audience with the sweetest jokes about the cheap Jew.”
A television show called “Il Hukm Ba’d il Muzawla,” a kind of “Candid Camera” knockoff, provides further evidence that Judeophobia in Egypt has become pathological. The show lures celebrities into an interview under the pretense that it will air on a foreign television station, and then tries to discomfit them by claiming they’re actually being interviewed for an Israeli show.
Recently, the show targeted actor Ayman Kandeel. The episode didn’t proceed as smoothly as planned. According to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute, the interviewer, an Egyptian woman named Iman Mubarak, surprises Kandeel by admitting that he’s appearing on Israeli television, and not German, as he was promised. A producer named Amr Alaa appears on set and asks Kandeel if there’s a problem.
Kandeel responds, “May I ask who you are?” Alaa, who is Arab, answers, “I am an Israeli.” More words are exchanged, and then Alaa says: “This is my channel. I am never afraid. It is you who are afraid, and that is why you are carrying a gun.”
“I don’t have a gun,” Kandeel responds. “To use my gun against you, I need to feel that you are worth something. But let me tell you what I can do. You stand right here. Relax.”
Kandeel then attacks Alaa, slapping him and shoving him, throwing chairs and cursing. He wheels on Mubarak, slaps her — knocking her against a wall — and curses her. A staff member runs onto the set: “Ayman, please, it’s a prank. Shame on you for hitting a woman.”
Kandeel is given Mubarak’s identification card, to prove that she isn’t Israeli. Finally, he says, “She’s Egyptian?”
“You hit me so hard,” Mubarak says.
Kandeel: “It was just one slap.” The audience applauds. Then he makes her an offer: “After the show, come to my car with me. I’ll put some lotion on your back.”
‘Long Live Egypt’
The next guest, the actress Mayer al-Beblawi, unburdens herself of an anti-Semitic tirade before being told the show is an Israeli production. The Israelis, she begins, “are real liars. They keep whining all the time about the Holocaust, or whatever it’s called. With all the Palestinians that you have killed, you are still whining about the Holocaust and its lousy figures?” She goes on: “They are the slayers of the prophets, what else can we say about them.”
The host, Mubarak, then provokes her: “You’ve got it wrong. They are the Chosen People.” Al-Beblawi responds: “The Chosen People? Allah did not curse the worm and the moth as much as he cursed the Jews.”
Al-Beblawi didn’t resort to violence. But the next guest, Mahmoud Abd al-Ghaffar, did, screaming at Mubarak, “You are a Jew!” and then pulling Alaa by the hair. Mubarak shouts: “Mahmoud, this is a ‘Candid Camera’ show. We are all Egyptians. Long live Egypt!”
Al Ghaffar says, “You brought me someone who looks like a Jew,” and then hugs Alaa. He turns to Mubarak: “If you weren’t a girl, the moment you told me you were Jewish … I hate the Jews to death.”
Mubarak then makes a statement that captures almost perfectly the moral perversion of the prank: “I’d like to tell you that I enjoyed today’s episode with Mahmoud. I didn’t know that there could be such patriotism, but it exists in every Egyptian who breathes the air of this country.”
In a column published last week, the Washington Post’s Colbert King correctly indicted the leadership of Iran as sponsors of “the most virulent form of state-sanctioned anti- Semitism since Nazi Germany.” It is true that the Iranian leadership is wildly anti-Semitic, but, on my visits to Iran, I’ve never personally felt the hatred of Jews on the popular level.
Not so in Egypt, where the virus has spread widely. As we just saw in the Sinai region, where militants killed 16 Egyptian soldiers and tried to storm across the Israeli border on Aug. 5, Egypt has serious problems, and they don’t have much to do with “cheap Jews.”
Any country in which anti-Semitism is considered a form of patriotism is in dire trouble.
(Jeffrey Goldberg is a Bloomberg View columnist and a national correspondent for the Atlantic. The opinions expressed are his own.)
You know, Ajam Media Collective? Them!
Female voters sing while waiting in line to vote. (Samia Mahgoub / UNDP)
Libya GNC Elections- Voting Day 07.07.2012 (United Nations Development Programme)
(via akio)
By: Soprgal on deviantART
This is a pretty ignorant and “scary” map for conservatives who shiver at the sight of Arabic. Why is Hizballah’s flag in place of Lebanon’s? Lebanon is a sovereign nation and has a national flag. Why is Hamas’s flag in place of the Palestinian flag? Where is the West Bank? Last time I checked, the Golan Heights belonged to Syria. Why is the Muslim Brotherhood’s flag in place of Egypt’s?
Also, it is fucking hilarious how you tag your shit with peace. Clearly, that is your intention.
#israel #middle east #egypt #lebanon #syria #jordan #iran #flags #peace#politics
For clarification, that is how the OP tagged this piece. No, Iran is not on this map.
I suppose I understand the usage of Muslim Brotherhood’s, Hamas’, and Hezbollah’s flags, but then you would have to use party flags or symbols for other countries too if you’d want it consistent. It seems that the OP only used party flags for those parties which are deemed threatening by the West.
It is also inconsistent to include Gaza as a separate state, but not the West Bank. Gaza is not truly sovereign and neither is the West Bank. Really, both should be included with Palestinian flags, or none should be with only the Israeli flag, as I’m sure the OP wishes Israel could keep all that land.
In short, I agree with Readyokaygo’s analysis, save for the Golan Heights. It was annexed by Israel in a defensive measure, all of the Druze who lived there have Israeli citizenship, and while I wish it had been given back to Syria in return for peace, neither Israel nor Syria have been willing to negotiate. It is not quite Israel proper, but nor is it on the same level as the Occupied Territories of the West Bank and Gaza. And it is certainly not Syria’s at the moment either.
On Alice Walker’s decision regarding the publication of her book in Israel
I disagree with her decision because I don’t understand what the principle behind her decision is. If her book was printed in Israel, it would have allowed her to get her message across to the Israelis. Why did she have to refuse that ? Once I read an article about Edward Said and it said that he wrote back to Zionism and presented to the Israelis a counter-narrative and the Palestinian perspective and experience of Zionism. Would Said refuse to have his work published in Israel? No. His entire career was about engaging with Zionism, mainly through literature. It’s in this tradition of the great Edward Said that Alice Walker should have published her book in Israel. Said was Palestinian and he never refused and turned down a chance to talk or write to the occupier. One can’t be more catholic than the Pope - Alice Walker’s stance on Israel in this case is absurd.
There are other occasions where I have disagreed with her. First, I don’t think that Israel should be compared to Apartheid South Africa because White South Africa was actually a lot worse than Israel’s occupation of Palestine. Above all, Palestine is a case on it’s own therefore I don’t understand why it should be compared to other atrocities in order to attract attention to it. The Palestinian suffering stands out on its own and it doesn’t have to be compared to anything else, otherwise it just discredits and compromises the Palestinian cause. I also don’t agree with her when she says that a two-state solution is not possible because Israel won’t allow it, therefore there has to be a single state. As if Israel is going to allow that.
- Jahanzeb Hussain
When Palestinians launch rockets out of Gaza that may fall in civilian areas in Israel, that’s terrorism—but when Israeli airstrikes actually kill droves of innocents in Gaza that’s a misfortunate ‘accident’.
We already know that, what’s new (but not surprising) is that when Palestinians target Israeli soldiers that’s still terrorism even though Israel tragetting Palestinian ‘militants’ is as right and normal and legitimate as can be.
Explain this to me. Please.
Accident is the key word. People who defend Israeli airstrikes believe that civilians aren’t targeted and so it isn’t terrorism. Whereas when Hamas and Islamic Jihad sends rockets into areas in which there are only civilians, they must be targeting civilians (and in fact they don’t deny it) and so it is terrorism.
Targeting civilians is always terrorism. If Israeli airstrikes actually do target civilians and not just militants, then that is state terrorism. If they don’t target civilians but civilians are killed anyways, that is not terrorism, but neither is it merely an unfortunate accident. Just because it isn’t terrorism, it doesn’t meant that civilian deaths are so easily excused.
This week, two totally different cases saw real progress towards resolution due to persistence, focus on achievable results and the use of nonviolent means. Palestinian prisoners and supporters of their just and reasonable requests in Palestine, the Arab world, and the international community saw a successful resolution of their demands. The end of administrative detentions was the aim when Khader Adnan and Hana Shalabi began the protests with a pair of hunger strikes followed by Thaer Halahla and Bilal Diab. This was followed by 1,600 prisoners demanding the end of solitary confinement, permission for family visits especially for Gaza families denied such visits since 2007 and agreement to allow prisoners to follow up educational pursuits. Thousands of prisoners refrained from eating for over 28 days while the administrative detainees went into their third month of a dangerous hunger strike. The selfless action of the prisoners touched people around the world who began numerous campaigns on social media and in front of UN agencies, and other forms of protests. In Amman, 15 young people, including two women, started their own hunger strike in a tent outside the Professional Associations Complex. They were especially supportive of over two dozen Jordanians in Israeli prisons, including Abdullah Barghouthi. The image of these supporters wearing light brown outfits resembling the prisoners’ uniforms went viral on line as they exchanged their own pictures with a faceless, brown-wearing sketch. Government officials in Jordan, Egypt, the U.S. and the EU, as well as the secretary general of the UN, were forced to take a stand and pressure the Israelis to accept the demands and use international standards for incarceration. The end was an Egyptian government-brokered deal that responded to most demands by Palestinian prisoners.
In another incident, Jordanian media professionals decided to investigate the status of persons with disabilities at privately-run centers. Radio Al Balad’s investigation unit and the Arab world’s investigative journalism network ARIJ cooperated over a year to look into the case. Because the media have little access to these centers, and due to the lack of serious monitoring, Al Balad’s journalist Hanan Khandakji was dispatched to do undercover reporting.
She volunteered at a few centers, and over a 12-month period was able to collect damning evidence of verbal, physical and sexual abuse. Attempts to get government officials to better scrutinize the center failed to produce results.Before publishing the report, the BBC Arabic TV station was approached and agreed to film a documentary based on the evidence collected. The two sides agreed to broadcast/publish the investigation simultaneously, along with The Alghad newspaper. The combined local and international video-based media coverage produced quick results. The King made an unannounced visit to Ibn Khaldoun and Al Razi centers, both owned by a single entrepreneur. After the visit, and based on the initial media evidence, His Majesty instructed the prime minister to quickly and comprehensively investigate the charges, turn over to the judiciary those guilty of wrongdoing and provide him with results within two weeks. Families of children with disabilities warmly welcomed the King’s intervention and will be awaiting the results of the special committee.
In both the prisoner protests and the media investigation a clear trend can be identified. Injustice is recognized, clear attainable goals are identified, comprehensive plans are assembled, hard work is invested over a long period and the public is involved. All this is done without violence, with strong determination and active effort and follow up.
While many choose the shortcut of violence or revolution to effect changes, it is clear that although nonviolent and society civil-based activities take longer time, they can produce impressive and tangible results.In the two above cases, actions and results cannot be expected based on a one-off activity or a faza (communal knee jerk emotional outburst); they require long-term, focused and comprehensive plans. Community leadership development (prisoners showed leadership), institutional capacity building, financial and administrative support are all important ingredients that must be included for results to be comprehensive and long lasting.
(via akio)


